Tuesday, August 7, 2012

MG 1/100 Gundam AGE-2 Normal - Review Images [Part 1] by YellowSubmarine

MG 1/100 Gundam AGE-2 Normal (Release Date: Aug 2012, Price: 4200 yen) 

Images via Yellow Submarine




CLICK HERE FOR FULL POST




















at

16 comments:

  1. AnonymousAugust 7, 2012 at 6:21 AM

    IMO the best looking Age gundam might consider getting this

    ReplyDelete
  2. PsyckoGunplaAugust 7, 2012 at 6:44 AM

    IMO the best AGE gundam out of the three

    ReplyDelete
  3. 悠人August 7, 2012 at 7:10 AM

    I bet they're gonna release the Special Ops version of this as an online exclusive for like 5000 YEN.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. SomeOtherAnonAugust 7, 2012 at 7:30 AM

      I bet I can do the same thing with a can of white spray for like 600yen

      Delete
    2. AnonymousAugust 7, 2012 at 7:30 AM

      And there's an EASIER way of getting it. Buy an MG AGE 2 and paint it!

      Delete
  4. AnonymousAugust 7, 2012 at 8:09 AM

    Best looking AGE unit ever!

    ReplyDelete
  5. AnonymousAugust 7, 2012 at 8:11 AM

    I'm gonna getcha Double Bullet!

    ReplyDelete
  6. AnonymousAugust 7, 2012 at 8:25 AM

    this needs an MG...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. AnonymousAugust 7, 2012 at 8:30 AM

      Huh?! It's already an MG.

      Delete
    2. AnonymousAugust 7, 2012 at 10:23 AM

      you sure are dumb, aren't you?

      Delete
  7. AnonymousAugust 7, 2012 at 9:54 AM

    wow this looks nice! never realised that his beam sabers could be double sided with a short beam like the Nu's

    ReplyDelete
  8. blacksolar212August 7, 2012 at 10:21 AM

    o_o double sided beam sabers MUST BUY NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!.

    ReplyDelete
  9. AnonymousAugust 7, 2012 at 10:21 AM

    You sure are dumb, aren't you?

    ReplyDelete
  10. UnknownAugust 7, 2012 at 11:43 AM

    This mg is gonna get special treatment from me ihooe i dont have to use glue please bandi no loose parts
    P.s. This should be good

    ReplyDelete
  11. AnonymousAugust 7, 2012 at 5:49 PM

    sleek and sexy ;)

    ReplyDelete